Pitchfork is far more than a music review site
October 14, 2020
Whether a new listener just entering the expansive world of music or a seasoned veteran looking for new tunes, Pitchfork is a friend to all. Ranging from reviews of new albums and new artists to the year’s featured picks and reviews of classic albums and old music, this site dedicated to discussing and appreciating music certainly has something for everyone.
There is a reason that this site is self-deemed “the most trusted voice in music.” The deep respect the site has for the experience of listening to music elicits a profound appreciation for what it means to listen to a particular artist. Beginning in 1995 as a blog run by Ryan Schreiber, Pitchfork was initially a review site for indie bands he had heard while working in a record shop. Quickly gaining credibility and online viewership, he expanded his reviews to new genres and with it, his fanbase. Since then, it has blossomed into a musical empire, with an average of 1.5 million views per month, making it the most popular independent online music publication.

However, Pitchfork is not without controversy. Many have accused the site of writing particularly provocative and disruptive articles just to attract attention, also called “clickbait.” Additionally, Pitchfork gives their writers a lot of freedom, creating a diversity in voices and opinions that can sometimes be misleading. Time and again, the site is accused of excessive verbosity, which does not fit the expectations of the music reviewing industry.
While their technique may be different, Pitchfork’s fundamental principles remain the same: a deep and profound love of the art of music.
Pitchfork is not just a music review site — it is an artistic rendition of what it looks like to fully experience music. Their reviews stray from the typical evaluation model many others, like music dedicated magazines Rolling Stone, Entertainment Weekly, and New Musical Express adhere to; instead, Pitchfork presents a personal interpretation of albums, artists or songs.
If you haven’t already, it’s time to take a deep dive into Pitchfork’s depths. Be warned, though, this tends to be an all-encompassing and all-consuming endeavor. This site has the ability to invoke deep reverence and appreciation for the artistry of your favorite tunes while simultaneously redefining, and sometimes ruining, your admiration for others. Whatever effect it may have, Pitchfork is a worthy use of time for any listener.
The Horizon intends for the comment section to foster healthy, meaningful dialogue. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we intend to minimize harm by not permitting the use of foul language, personal attacks, or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. Comments are reviewed and must be approved by a moderator to ensure that they meet these standards. While anyone is allowed to comment, The Horizon intends to prioritize student voices. The Horizon does not allow anonymous comments, and all comments require a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.